Inhabited by Algorithms
Prostheses, Identity, and the Reconfiguration of the Social
Keywords:
algomorphic society, digital identity, emotionsAbstract
This editorial introduces a special issue exploring the intersections between technology, identity, and social life in the digital age. Taking the prosthesis as a paradigmatic figure, it argues that technological mediation is not external to the human condition but constitutive of it: from bodily devices to algorithmic environments, artifacts co-produce subjectivities, redistribute agency, and reconfigure the norms through which bodies, capacities, and identities are recognized. Drawing on STS, sociology of the body, and the framework of algomorphic society, the editorial examines how digital platforms and AI-based systems — understood as semi-autonomous relational actors — reshape self-presentation, emotional regulation, and practices of recognition. The contributions gathered in the issue address phenomena including algorithmic legitimation, AI imaginaries among young adults, online shaming, moral panic, and the attention architectures of digital childhood. Together, they interrogate the threshold at which technology ceases to be a support and becomes a co-constitutive matrix of social experience.
References
Akrich, M. (1992). The de-scription of technical objects. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 205–224). MIT Press.
Annandale, E. (1998). The sociology of health and medicine. Polity.
Beer, D. (2017). The social power of algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1216147
Bourdieu, P. (1979). La distinction: Critique sociale du jugement. Minuit (ed. it. La distinzione. Il Mulino, 1983).
Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. MIT Press.
boyd, d. (2010). Social network sites as networked publics. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 39–58). Routledge.
Bucher, T. (2018). If...then: Algorithmic power and politics. Oxford University Press.
Canguilhem, G. (1966). Le normal et le pathologique. Presses Universitaires de France (ed. it. Il normale e il patologico. Guaraldi, 1975).
Charmaz, K. (1995). The body, identity, and self. The Sociological Quarterly, 36(4), 657–680.
Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2017). The mediated construction of reality. Polity.
Davis, L. J. (1995). Enforcing normalcy: Disability, deafness, and the body. Verso.
Garland-Thomson, R. (1996). Extraordinary bodies: Figuring physical disability in American culture and literature. Columbia University Press.
Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P. J. Boczkowski, & K. A. Foot (Eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society (pp. 167–194). MIT Press.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday (ed. it. La vita quotidiana come rappresentazione. Il Mulino, 1986).
Grassi, E. (2024). Per una sociologia algomorfica: Il ruolo degli algoritmi nei mutamenti sociali. FrancoAngeli.
Grassi, E. (2025a). The silent revolution of algoagents: Relational reconfigurations and emerging paradigms. Sicurezza e Scienze Sociali, 13(2), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17297462
Grassi, E. (2025b). Emotional intersections: Exploring the ontogenesis of human-algorithm relationships. Sociologia Italiana – AIS Journal of Sociology, 29, 11–34. https://doi.org/10.82031/2281-2652-202529-1
Haraway, D. J. (1985). Manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980s. Socialist Review, 80, 65–108.
Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld: From garden to earth. Indiana University Press.
Jasanoff, S. (Ed.). (2004). States of knowledge: The co-production of science and the social order. Routledge.
Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 225–258). MIT Press.
Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1964). Le geste et la parole. Albin Michel.
Marwick, A., & boyd, d. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810365313
Mauss, M. (1934). Les techniques du corps. Journal de Psychologie, 32(3–4), 271–293 (ed. it. Le tecniche del corpo. ETS. 2017).
Shilling, C. (2003). The body and social theory (2nd ed.). Sage.
Simondon, G. (1958). Du mode d’existence des objets techniques. Aubier (ed. it. Sull’esistenza degli oggetti tecnici. Orthotes. 2021).
Stiegler, B. (1998). Technics and time, 1: The fault of Epimetheus. Stanford University Press (ed. it. La colpa di Epimeteo. La tecnica e il tempo (Vol. 1). Luiss University Press).
van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018). The platform society. Oxford University Press.
