Come definire un percorso di successo.

Valutazione e follow-up della presa in carico degli uomini autori di violenza

Authors

  • Maddalena Cannito University of Turin, Italy
  • Paola Maria Torrioni University of Turin, Italy

Keywords:

follow-up, evaluation, interventions with male perpetrators of violence

Abstract

The paper addresses the issue of evaluation and follow-up of interventions of Centers for Authors of Violence (CUAV). Through empirical data, collected in the Piedmont region, through focus groups and interviews with CUAV’s workers, the ways in which those working with perpetrators of violence define a “successful intervention” were explored. What emerges is that evaluation is still at an extremely embryonic stage and not guided by shared and codified tools. This leads to defining success as change of the user/patient assessed by the practitioner/psychologist, often without taking into consideration also a collective assessment and a change in gender attitudes and stereotypes. An important finding that emerged from the research is the centrality of the anti-violence network in assessing the effectiveness of the programs; an aspect, however, that still has to be built but increasingly central given the entry of judges and lawyers into the network, following the approval of the so-called Codice Rosso.

References

Akoensi, T.D., Koehler, J.A., Lösel, F., & Humphreys, D.K. (2012). Domestic Violence Per-petrator Programs in Europe, Part II: A Systematic Review of the State of Evidence. In-ternational Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 57(10), 1206-1225.

Bezzi, C. (2007). Cos’è la valutazione. Franco Angeli.

Babcock, J.C., Green, C.E., & Robie, C. (2004). Does batterers treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic treatment. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1023-1053.

Bozzoli, A., Merelli, M., Pizzonia, S., & Ruggerini, M. G. (a cura di) (2017). I centri per uomini che agiscono violenza contro le donne in Italia. Associazione LeNove.

Cannito, M., & Sciarrino, N. (2024). Ai margini della rete ma in movimento: i Centri per uomini autori di violenza. In Cannito M., & Torrioni P.M. (a cura di), Reti in azione. Strumenti teorici e pratici nel campo dell’antiviolenza (pp. 137-161). Bologna: Il Mu-lino.

Cannito, M., & Torrioni, P.M. (a cura di) (2024). Reti in azione. Strumenti teorici e pratici nel campo dell’antiviolenza. Il Mulino.

Cannon, C., Corvo, K., Buttell, F., & Hamel, J. (2021). Barriers to Advancing Evidence-Based Practice in Domestic Violence Perpetrator Treatment in the United States: Ideol-ogy, Public Funding, or Both?. Partner Abuse, 12(2), 221-237.

Centro di Ascolto Uomini Maltrattanti (CAM) (2022), IMPACT Report. Regione Toscana. https://www.centrouominimaltrattanti.org/docs/2023/CAM%20Impact%20Report%202022%20(1).pdf (consultato il 18/10/2023).

Davies, H.T.O., Nutley, S.M., & Smith, P.C. (2000). What Works: Evidence-based Policy and Practice in Public Services. The Policy Press.

Davis, R.C., & Taylor, B.G. (1999). Does Batterer Treatment Reduce Violence?. Women & Criminal Justice, 10(2), 69-93.

Demurtas, P., & Misiti, M. (a cura di) (2021). Violenza contro le donne in Italia. Ricerche, orientamenti e buone pratiche. Guerini Editore.

Demurtas, P., & Peroni, C. (a cura di) (2019). I programmi di trattamento per autori di vio-lenza. Quadro di sintesi dei risultati della rilevazione. CNR-IRPPS.

Demurtas, P., & Peroni, C. (2021). I programmi rivolti agli uomini maltrattanti alla luce de-gli standard europei. In Demurtas P., & Misiti M. (a cura di), Violenza contro le donne in Italia. Ricerche, orientamenti e buone pratiche (pp. 179-197). Guerini Editore.

Dixon, L., Archer, J., & Graham-Kevan, N. (2012). Perpetrator programmes for partner vio-lence: Are they based on ideology or evidence?. Legal and Criminological Psycholo-gy, 17, 196-215.

Eckhardt, C.I., Murphy, C.M., Whitaker, D.J., Sprunger, J., Dykstra, R., & Woodard, K. (2013). The effectiveness of intervention programs for perpetrators and victims of inti-mate partner violence. Partner Abuse, 4(2), 196-231.

Gondolf, E.W. (2015). Gender-Based Perspectives on Batterer Programs: Program Leaders on History, Approach, Research, And Development. Lexington Books.

Haggård, U., Freij, I., Danielsson, M., Wenander, D., & Långström, N. (2017). Effectiveness of the IDAP Treatment Program for Male Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Violence: A Controlled Study of Criminal Recidivism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(7), 1027-1043.

Herman, K., Rotunda, R., Williamson, G., & Vodanovich, S. (2014). Outcomes From a Du-luth Model Batterer Intervention Program at Completion and Long-Term Follow-Up. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 53(1), 1-18.

Hester, M., & Lilley, S-J. (2014). Domestic and sexual violence perpetrator Programs: Arti-cle 16 of the Istanbul Convention. Council of Europe.

Hester, M., Lilley, S-J., O’Prey, L., & Budde, J. (2014). Overview and analysis of research studies evaluating European perpetrator programmes. https://www.work-with-perpetrators.eu/fileadmin/WWP_Network/redakteure/IMPACT/Daphne_III_Impact_-_Working_paper_2_-_Overview_and_Analysis_of_Research_Studies_-_Evaluating_European_Perpetrator_Programmes.pdf (consultato il 25/09/2023).

Lilley-Walker, S-J., Hester, M., & Turner, W. (2018). Evaluation of European Domestic Vio-lence Perpetrator Programmes: Toward a Model for Designing and Reporting Evalua-tions Related to Perpetrator Treatment Interventions. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(4), 868-884.

Oddone, C. (2020). Uomini normali. Maschilità e violenza nell’intimità. Rosenberg & Sel-lier.

Palumbo, M. (2001). Il processo della valutazione. Franco Angeli.

Poynter, T.L. (1991). An Evaluation of a Group Programme for Male Perpetrators of Domes-tic Violence: A Follow-up Study. Australian Journal of Marriage and Family, 12(2), 64-76.

Relive (2017). Linee guida nazionali dei programmi di trattamento per uomini autori di violenza contro le donne nelle relazioni affettive. http://www.associazionerelive.it/joomla/images/LineeGuidaRelivea.pdf

Tomei, G. (2023). Developmental Outcome Monitoring and Evaluation (DOME). Un mo-dello riflessivo di progettazione e valutazione per il contrasto della povertà educativa minorile. Milano: FrancoAngeli.

Westmarland, N., Kelly, L., & Chalder-Mills, J. (2010). Domestic violence perpetrator pro-grammes: What counts as success?. Respect.

Westmarland, N., & Kelly, L. (2013). Why Extending Measurements of ‘Success’ in Domes-tic Violence Perpetrator Programmes Matters for Social Work. British Journal of Social Work, 43, 1092-1110.

Yakeley, J. (2022). Treatment for perpetrators of intimate partner violence: What is the evi-dence?. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 78, 5-14.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-31