Expert construction during the Italian vaccination campaign against COVID-19: positional, reputational, and communicational spheres in comparison

Authors

  • Rossana Cataldo University of Naples Federico II, Italy
  • Gabriella Punziano University of Naples Federico II, Italy
  • Barbara Saracino University of Bologna Alma Mater Studiorum, Italy
  • Ferdinando Iazzetta University of Roma Sapienza, Italy

Keywords:

visible expert, media representation, COVID-19 vaccination campaign

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to understand what mechanism leads specific actors of the scientific community to assume the central role of experts during the COVID-19 pandemic vaccination campaign. Thanks to the understanding of the world of narratives and self-constructed representations we will try to understand if the figure of the expert is influenced by the institutional role they play, the network of collaborations and the academic network as a proxy of their reputation and, finally, what figure emerges instead from the mainstream media such as the press and social networks such as Facebook and Twitter.

References

Algan, Y., Cohen, D., Davoine, E., Foucault, M., & Stantcheva, S. (2021). Trust in scientists in times of pandemic: Panel evidence from 12 countries. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(40).

Alonso, S., Cabrerizo, F.J., Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F. (2009). h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields. Journal of Informetrics, Volume 3, Issue 4, Pp 273-289, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2009.04.001.

Beltrame L. (2007), Ipse dixit. I premi Nobel come argomento di autorità nella comunicazione pubblica della scienza, «Studi di Sociologia», 1, pp. 77-98.

Bradshaw, S., Howard, P.N. (2018). Sourcing and Automation of Political News and Information over Social Media in the United States, 2016-2018. In Political Communication, 37:2, 173-193, DOI: 10.1080/10584609.2019.1663322

Bucchi, M. (1996). La scienza e i mass media: la fusione fredda nei quotidiani italiani, Nuncius, 2, 1996, 581-611.

Bucchi, M. & Trench, B. (Eds.) (2014). Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology (2nd edition). London: Routledge.

Casiday, R. (2007). Children’s health and the social theory of risk: insights from the British measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) controversy. Soc Sci Med DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.04.023

Carey, J.W., (1988). Communications as Culture.

Cheng, D., Claessens, M., Gascoigne, N.R.J., Metcalfe, J., Schiele, B. & Shi, S. (Eds.) (2008). Communicating Science in Social Contexts: New Models, New Practices. Switzerland: Springer.

Coleman, R.J., (2002). Address on: The US, Europe, and Precaution: A Comparative Case Study Analysis of the Management of risk in a Complex World, Grand Hotel-Bruges,11/12/January,2002.http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/health_consumer/library/speeches/index_en.html#coleman

Collins, H., Evans, R. (2002). The Third Wave of Science Studies. In Social Studies of Science 32(2). DOI:10.1177/0306312702032002003

Colombo, F., (2015). Social TV: Produzione, esperienza e valore nell'era digitale. EGEAspa

Coombs, W.T. (2012). The Handbook of Crisis Communication. DOI:10.1002/9781444314885

Covello, V.T. (2016). Risk Communication: An Emerging Area of Health Communication Research. Pp. 359-373. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1992.11678816

Diekema SD. (2012). Improving childhood vaccination rates. In The New England Journal of Medicine. Boston. pp.366-91. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1113008

Goodell, R. (1977). The visible scientists. London: Little, Brown.

Goddiksen, M. (2014). Clarifying interactional and contributory expertise. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 47, 111-117.

Hirsch, J., E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. In Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences 102 (46), 16569-16572.

Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal influence: the part played by people in the flow of mass communications. Free Press.

Larson, H. J., Clarke, R. M., Jarrett, C., Eckersberger, E., Levine, Z., Schulz, W. S., & Paterson, P. (2018). Measuring trust in vaccination: A systematic review. Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 14(7), 1599-1609.

Lazer, D.M.J. (2018). The science of fake news. Vol 359, Issue 6380 pp. 1094-1096. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998

Lippmann, W. (1922). Public opinion. Harcourt, Brace.

Maasen, S. & Weingart, P. (Eds.) (2005). Democratization of Expertise? Exploring Novel Forms of Scientific Advice in Political Decision-Making. Switzerland: Springer.

Marcinkowski, F. e Kohring, M. (2014). The changing rationale of science communication: a challenge to scientific autonomy. JCOM 13 (3), 1-8. URL: http://jcom.sissa.it/archive/13/03/JCOM_1303_2014_C01.

Metcalfe, J., Riedlinger, M., Bauer, M.W, Chakraborty, A., Gascoigne, T., Guenther, L., Joubert, M., Kaseje, M., Herrera-Lima, S., Revuelta, G., Riise, J. & Schiele B. (2020). The COVID-19 mirror: reflecting science-society relationships across 11 countries. In Journal of Science Communication, 19(07). DOI: https://doi.org/10.22323/2.19070205

Noelle-Neumann, E. (1984). The spiral of silence: Public opinion, our social skin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Parrot, R. (2009). Talking about Health: Why Communication Matters.

Piselli, F. (2001). L’analisi delle reti nelle scienze sociali. Donzelli editore, Roma.

Peters, H.P. (2014). Scientist as Public Experts: Expectations and Responsibilities. In M., Bucchi & B., Trench (Eds.). Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology (pp. 70-82). London: Routledge.

Riva, G., I social network, Il Mulino, Bologna 2016: 194 [http://hdl.handle.net/10807/74720]

Roqueplo P. (1997). Entre savoir et décision: l’expertise scientifique, Paris, INRA.

Rubin, A. (2020) Trust, reputation and expert expert’s visibility. the case-study of the european researchers’ night. In 82- LXIV | 2020. (pp. 25-42). https://doi.org/10.4000/qds.3666

Saracino, B. (2020). Comunicare la scienza al tempo del Coronavirus: tra domanda e offerta di informazione. AIS Journal of Sociology N.16, pp:99-119. DOI: DOI: 10.1485/2281-2652-202016-7

Sfardini, A. (2020). Come comunicare la pandemia? Credibilità e fiducia delle fonti istituzionali nell’informazione italiana sul Covid-19, in M. Sala e M. Scaglioni (a cura di) L’altro virus. Comunicazione e disinformazione al tempo del Covid-19 (pp. 63-73). Milano: Vita e Pensiero.

Thomas, K. e Senkpeni, A.D. (2020). What should health science journalists do in epidemic responses? AMA Journal of Ethics, 22 (1), 55-60.

Vasterman, P.L. e Ruigrok, N. (2013). Pandemic alarm in the Dutch media: Media coverage of the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic and the role of the expert sources. European Journal of Communication, 28 (4), 436-453.

Published

2022-06-01