Sport as a Tool for Integration and Social Inclusion. The Case Study “EsportInclou” of the Sport Institute of Barcelona

Authors

Keywords:

Sport, Community, Integration, Social inclusion, Sport facilities

Abstract

The note intends to introduce some specific points of reflection about how the “diversity”, in various forms, can be reduced through physical activity and sport practice. First of all, the note will introduce the European framework on the topic concerning inclusion and integration through sport and after will be observed the case study "EsportInclou" developed by the Sport Institute of Barcelona. Following the guidelines provided by the European Council, the city of Barcelona through the Barcelona EsportInclou plan, defines specific programs and actions that are able to help the integration and inclusion of those people who are affected by physical, intellectual disorders, auditory, visual and / or mental living in the neighbourhoods. The Barcelona EsportInclou program emphasizes the importance of defining a new idea of ??transformation. The plan tried to develop changes through the conception of the services offered without any type of limitation and that can favour the reduction of barriers between subjects. Finally, the contribution observes how the continuity of the financial interventions established new objectives included in the planning of the three-year period 2018-2021 (+21% M€).

References

Ajuntament de Barcelona. (2018). Convivim esportivament. Retrieved from: http://www.bcn.cat/lesportensfamesgrans/ca/convivim-esportivament.html

Ajuntament de Barcelona. (2018). ProgramEsportInclou. Retrieved from:https://www.barcelona.cat/lesportinclou/ca/

Almeida, M.E. et al. (2010). New rhetoric’s for old practices. Rethinking the idea of diver-sity and its use in understanding and addressing disability. Poli?tica y Sociedad. 47(1). 27-44.

Bauman, Z. (2000). Globalisation. The human consequences. New York: Columbia Uni-versity Press.

Baumann, G. (1999). The multicultural Riddle. London: Routledge.

Canevaro A. (2002). Good integration practices. in A. Canevaro, D. Ianes (a cura di). Good practices in school integration. Trento: Erickson.

European Commission. (2007). White Paper on Sport. Bruxelles: European Commission

European Commission. (2008): Discrimination in the European Union: perceptions, ex-periences and attitudes, Special Eurobarometer No. 296, Directorate General Employ-ment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities.

Eurostat. (2001). Disability and social participation in Europe, Luxemburg: European Commission.

Ghirlanda, S. (2003). Sport for all...space for the disabled. Pisa: Edition Del Cerro.

Gramiccia, R. (2016). In praise of fragility. Milano: Mimesis Edition.

OMS. (1983). International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Manual for the classification of the consequences of disease. Madrid: Inserso.

OMS. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health (CIF). Madrid: Ministerio de Trabajo y AsuntosSociales.

Palacios, A., i J. Roman?ach. (2008). The diversity model: a new vision of bioethics from the perspective of people with functional diversity (disability). Intersticios. 2(2). 37-47.

UNESCO. (2001). UNESCO Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

United Nations General Assembly. (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Dis-abilities (CRDP). New York: ONU.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-22