Diaries from Isolation. Digital Testimonials' Analysis During COVID-19 Emergency

Authors

  • Jessica Parola University of Naples Federico II, Italy
  • Federica Palmieri University of Naples Federico II, Italy
  • Marco Sallusto Palmiero University of Naples Federico II, Italy
  • Roberta Tofani University of Naples Federico II, Italy

Keywords:

Covid-19, Lockdown, Phenomenological perspective, Digital methods

Abstract

The research investigates the social effects of the atypical domestic containment situation during the Covid-19 emergency in Italy. The survey, which is placed in a phenomenological perspective, shows how individuals and the community have been able
to develop an adaptation or resilience process to the lockdown in order to conform their life to the “new ordinary”, making it real and purposeful. The research process, which was entirely conducted digitally through specific software for qualitative analysis, has
developed dynamically, following the Grounded Theory approach. Facebook posts and Instagram audio tracks combined with newspaper articles represent the cases of the research. While on one hand, digitality has allowed an individual the perception of
normality by feeling part of a community, on the other it has revealed various forms of digital divide, characterized by different levels of literacy at school, at work and domestically. The social disadvantage does not exclusively concern the digital world but rather on the lockdown that has heightened the systematic exclusion of the most fragile sections of the population.

References

Amaturo E., Punziano G. (2013). Content analysis. Tra comunicazione e politica, Ledizioni, Milano.

Becker H. S. (2007). I trucchi del mestiere. Come fare ricerca sociale, il Mulino, Bologna.

Caliandro A., Gandini A. (2019). I metodi digitali nella ricerca sociale, Carocci Editore, Roma.

Cardano M. (2008). La ricerca qualitativa, il Mulino, Bologna.

Cipriani R, Cipolla C, Losacco G. (2013). La ricerca qualitativa fra tecniche tradizionali ed e-methods, FrancoAngeli, Milano.

Coppola L. (2017). Nvivo: un programma per l’analisi qualitativa. Franco Angeli, Milano.

DPCM (DECRETO DEL PRESIDENTE DEL CONSIGLIO DEI MINISTRI), 4 marzo 2020. Ulteriori disposizioni attuative del decreto-legge, 23 febbraio 2020, n. 6, recante misure urgenti in materia di contenimento e gestione dell'emergenza epidemiologica da COVID-19, applicabili sull'intero territorio nazionale. (20A01475) (GU Serie Generale n.55 del 04-03-2020).

Giddens A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity, Stanford University Press, Redwood City, California.

Glaser B. G., Strauss A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategies for Qualitative Research, Aldine Publishing Company, London, trad. It., La scoperta della grounded theory. Strategie per la ricerca qualitative, Armando Editore, Roma, 2009.

Hughes E. C. (2010). Lo sguardo sociologico, il Mulino, Bologna.

La Repubblica. (21 aprile 2020). "Napul'è mille panari", si estende l'iniziativa del paniere solidale.

Lewins A., Silver C. (2007). Using software in qualitative research. A step-by-step guide, Sage publications, California.

Lupton D. (2018). Sociologia digitale, Pearson, Milano-Torino.

Mingione E. e Pugliese E. (2010). Il lavoro, Carocci editore, Roma.

Navigli R., Martelli F. (2019). An overview of word and sense similarity, Cambridge University Press.

Nippert-Eng Christena E. (1996). Home and Work: Negotiating Boundaries Through Everyday Life, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Pecchinedda G. (2009). La narrazione della società, Ipermedium Libri, Caserta.

Schreier M (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. London: Sage.

Schütz A., (1932). Der sinnhafte Aufbau der sozialen Welt: Eine Einleitung in die verstehenden Soziologie, Julius Springer, Vienna.

Thomas W. I. (1928). The child in America. Behavior problems and programs, Forgotten Books.

Downloads

Published

2021-10-01