Sull’utilità e il danno della conoscenza sociologica

  • Ilaria Riccioni Libera Università di Bolzano, Italy
Keywords: Sociology, Culture, American sociology

Abstract

The discipline of sociology observes the intertwining of social dynamics and social tendencies in relation to institutional power. How this observation becomes social knowledge concerns different areas: from empirical methodologies to philosophical reflexivity that can orient the starting question. However, sociology is not only a descriptive kind of science, but also a critical one. Through hermeneutics and activity, as well as active observation, sociology fulfill its role among other sciences. My thesis here is that in order to keep up with this role, in order to be able to absolve this role also in contemporary society, sociology has to become again the study of large-scale historical processes and structures, starting from the historical context in which are situated also in a comparative way. Also, problematizing the social sciences paradigm to which sociology itself is referring to so to relate it to the big changes in politics and economy from the ‘70s up to now. This essay will try to develop a critical view towards sociological knowledge  recurring to some modern sociologist of the American and European tradition.

References

Adorno, T.W. (1954-2015). Minima moralia. Meditazioni della vita offesa. Torino: Einau-di.

Alexander, J. (2003). The Meanings of Social Life: a Cultural Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.

Baudrillard, J. (1992). The disappearance of arts and politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Bell, D. (1970). The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism. The Public Interest, 21 (3), 16-43.

De La Fuente, E. (2007). The Place of Culture in Sociology. Romanticism and debates about the ‘cultural turn’. The Journal of Sociology, Australian Sociological Association, 43(2), 115–130.

Durkheim, E. (1893-1977). La divisione del lavoro sociale. Torino: Comunità.

Durkheim, E. (1895-2008). Le regole del metodo sociologico. Torino: Einaudi

Ferrarotti, F. (1968). Trattato di Sociologia. Torino: Utet.

Ferrarotti, F. (2014). Scienza e Coscienza. Verità personali e pratiche pubbliche. Bologna: Dehoniane.

Ferrarotti, F. (2016). La conoscenza partecipata. Chieti: Solfanelli.

Ferrarotti, F. (2018). Filosofia e ricerca sociale. Chieti: Solfanelli.

Horkheimer, M. (1974). Teoria critica. Torino: Einaudi.

Jameson, F. (1989). Il postmoderno, o la logica culturale del tardo capitalismo. Trad. it., Milano: Garzanti.

Lynd, R.S. (1939-1967). Knowledge for What? The Place of Social Science in American Culture. Princeton University Press.

Marcuse, H. (1964-1999). L’uomo a una dimensione. Torino: Einaudi.

McClung Lee, A. (1986). Sociology for Whom?. Syracuse University Press.

Nussbaum, M. (2010). Not for Profit. Why Democracy Needs the Humanities. Princeton University Press.

Pareto, V. (1916-1988). Trattato di sociologia generale. Introd. G. Busino, Torino: Utet.

Prigogine, I. & Stengers, I. (1999). La nuova alleanza. Metamorfosi della scienza. Torino: Piccola Biblioteca Einaudi.

Postone, M. (2012). Thinking the Global Crisis. The South Atlantic Quarterly. 111(2), 227- 249.

Postone, M. (1978). Necessity, Labour and Time, a Reinterpretation of the Marxian Critique of Capitalism. Social Research, 45(4), Marx Today, 739-788.

Rosa, H. (2015). Accelerazione e alienazione. Per una teoria critica del tempo nella tarda modernità. Torino: Einaudi.

Rosa, H. (2016). Resonanz. Eine Soziologie der Weltbeziehung. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

Schütz, A. (1964). Don Quixote and the Problem of Reality. In “Collected Papers II. Studies in Social Theory”. Den Haag: Nijhoff.

Simmel, G. (1908-1998). Sociologia. Torino: ed Comunità.

Sommer, D. (2014). The Work of Art in the World: Civic Agency and Public Humanities. Durham: Duke University Press.

Weber, M. (1922-1995). Economia e società. Torino: Einaudi.

Published
2019-05-26