Il lessico istituzionale della violenza contro le donne: modelli teorici a confronto

  • Daniela Bandelli Università LUMSA of Rome, Italy
Keywords: Domestic violence, Gender violence, Policies

Abstract

This article aims to clarify theoretical models underpinning some of the terms employed in institutional discourse on violence against women in Italy, namely ‘gender based violence’ (GBV), ‘domestic violence’ (DV), and ‘intimate partner violence’ (IPV). The first term qualifies disparate types of violence as consequences of gender inequality and sexism. Be-cause these factors are not always the principal or the sole causes of all cases of violence against women, the term should be used cautiously. DV and IPV categorize violent acts in light of the relationships between involved subjects and enable to reach either women and men in the role of aggressors and victims.

References

Bandelli, D., Porcelli, G. (2016). Femicide in Italy. Femminicidio, moral panic and progressivist discourse. Sociologica, 1, 1-34.

Bates, E.A., Graham-Kevan, N., Archer, J. (2014). Testing predictions from the male control theory of men's partner violence. Aggressive Behavior, vol. 40, 1, 42-55.

Bumiller, K. (2009). In an abusive state. Durham: Duke University Press.

Collins, R. (2009). Violence a micro-sociological theory. Oxford: Princeton University Press.

Corradi, C. (2011). Love as a total institution. An interpretive model of violence against women. Spazio filosofico, 3, 391-401.

Creazzo, G. (2008). La costruzione sociale della violenza contro le donne in Italia. Studi della Questione Criminale, vol. 3, 2, 15-42.

Dutton, D.G., Nicholls, T.L. (2005). The gender paradigm in domestic violence research and theory: Part 1—The conflict of theory and data. Aggression and Violent Behavior, vol. 11, 6, 680–714.

Felson, R.B. (2002). Violence and gender reexamined. Washington: American Psychological Association.

Gracia, E., Merlo, J. (2016). Intimate partner violence against women and the Nordic paradox. Social Science & Medicine, 157, 27-30.

Harrington, C. (2010). Politicization of sexual violence: from abolitionism to peacekeeping. Burlington: Ashgate.

Knoblock, J. (2008). Gender and violence: A reflective Sociology of how gender ideologies and practices contribute to gender based violence. Human Architecture, vol. 6, 2, 91-101.

ISTAT (2005). L’istruzione della popolazione al 2001. Dati definitivi del Censimento 2001.

Macrì, P.G., et al. (2012). Indagine conoscitiva sulla violenza verso il maschile. Rivista di Criminologia, Vittimologia e Sicurezza, vol. 6, 3, 30-47.

Salerno, A., Giuliano, S. (2012). La violenza indicibile: l'aggressività femminile nelle relazioni interpersonali. Milano: FrancoAngeli.

Stamatel, J. (2014). Explaining variations in female homicide victimization rates across Europe. European Journal of Criminology, vol. 11, 5, 578-600.

Straus, M.A., Gelles, R.J. (1986). Societal change and change in family violence from 1975 to 1985 as revealed by two national surveys. Journal of Marriage and Family, vol. 48, 3, 465-479.

Walby, S., Towers, J., Balderston, S. Corradi, C., Francis, B., et al. (2017). The concept and measurement of violence against women and men. Bristol: Policy Press.

Willson, P. (2010). Italiane. Bari: Laterza.

Published
2017-12-18
Section
Riflessioni e proposte [Reflections & proposals] - Present up to Vol. 2(2)/2017