Valorizzazione del capitale umano e contrasto alla disoccupazione tecnologica
il ruolo di un’Agenzia Nazionale per la Formazione
The introduction of ICT in production processes has led to a profound change in the Italian professional structure. A greater demand for technical and soft skills has facilitated a process of substitution of those not properly trained workers. The nanismo of Italian company with a strong presence of the production units in the traditional economic sectors has increased the gap between the quality of de-mand for Italian work from that of other countries. The reluctance of companies to invest in new technologies and training programs for the workforce has negatively affected the growth rate of labor productivity. Wage moderation and the privatiza-tion of the Nineties have further discouraged economic decisions favourable to capital augmenting innovation with the aim of exploiting the cheap labor through labor augmenting productive organizations. In this context, the role of public insti-tutions in terms of training becomes crucial. Create a National Agency of Educa-tion means putting in place a training network can address the employment effects of innovation. A technological development that can make a upgrading the labor market presupposes a system of services for the employment in which social poli-cies are able to ensure to all individuals the same opportunities for learning.
Accornero, A. (1997). Era il secolo del lavoro. Bologna: il Mulino.
Acemoglu, D. (2002). Technical Change, Inequality and the Labor Market. Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 7-72.
Acemoglu, D., & Autor, D. (2011). Skills, Tasks and Technologies: Implications for Employment and Earnings. Handbook of Labor Economics, 4, 1043-1171.
Autor, D., & Dorn, D. (2013). The Growth of Low-Skills Service Jobs and the Polarization of the US Labor Market. American Economic Review, 103, 1553-1597.
Autor, D., Katz, L., & Krueger, A. (1998). Computing inequality: Have Computers Changed The Labor Market?. The Quarterly Journal of Eco-nomics, 1169-1213.
Banca D'Italia (2015). Capitale umano e crescita, Intervento del Governatore della Banca D'Italia, 30 gennaio 2015.
Booth, A., & Snower, D. (1996). Acquiring Skills: Market Failures, their Symptoms and Policy Responses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cedefop (2012). Future skills supply and demand in Europe. Luxembourg: Research Paper, n.26.
Coronas, G. (2003). La formazione continua dei lavoratori. Fondo sociale europeo, accordi, norme nazionali. Roma: Ediesse.
Daveri, F. (2006). Innovazione cercasi. Il problema italiano. Bari: Laterza.
Evangelista, R. (1995). Innovazione e occupazione nell'industria italiana: un'analisi per imprese e settori. L'Industria, 107-126.
Felipe, J., & Kumar U. (2011). Unit Labor Costs in the Eurozone: The Competitiveness Debate Again, Levy Economics Institute, Working Pa-per Collection.
Frey, C.B., & Osborne, M. (2013). The future of employment: how susceptible are jobs to computeristaion?, September 17, Oxford University Press.
Gallino, L. (2003). La scomparsa dell'Italia industriale. Torino: Einaudi.
Istat (2013). La formazione nelle imprese in Italia. Roma: Statistiche Report.
Kim, P. (2015). The Mooc Revolution. New York: Routledge.
Krueger, A.B. (1993). How Computers Have Changed The Wage Structure: Evidence from Microdata, 1984-1989. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 33-60.
Oecd (2010). Empowering people to innovate. Paris: The Oecd Innovation Strategy.
Oecd (2015). Employment Outlook. Paris: Oecd Publishing.
Pianta, M. (1996). L'innovazione nell'industria italiana e gli effetti economici e occupazionali. Economia e Politica Industriale, 89, 261-280.
Ross, A. (2004). No collar: The Humane Workplace And Its Hidden Costs. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Stieglitz, J. (2014). Il prezzo delle disuguaglianze. Torino: Einaudi.