The Biopolitical Quest for Individuality as a Reactionary Device

Keywords: Governmentality, Psychopolitics, Symbolic exchange

Abstract

With the advent of digitization and the affirmation of a symbolic value on social exchange within capital, public demonstrations of discontent are nowadays being performed along an aesthetic canon, thus losing their possible revolutionary potential. Once we internalized that it’s easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism, our struggles become individually symbolic and turn to aestheticism. Rather than stopping discontent, the power chooses to allow it because its performative content has already been neutralized. These demonstrations happen within a democratic culture – they play within the rules of the game. This is the imperial domination: to guarantee a resemblance of global peace for capital to develop, at the price of local omni-crisis. If Empire is born and shows itself as crisis, this crisis is felt at every peripheral point of the Empire. Solutions of governmentality have worked until now, but at a cost: even though there still are cathartic events, they don't manage release social tension completely – they always leave a mimetic residual. It's on those physical and psychological spaces of individual recognition that the Empire exercises its domination. And it’s there that forms of resistance can be tested.

References

Agamben, G. (1991). I Situazionisti. Rome: Manifestolibri.

Baudrillard, J. (2017). The consumer society : myths and structures. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.

Bauman, Z., & Lyon, D. (2016). Liquid surveillance : a conversation. New York: Polity.

Berardi, F. B. (2001). La fabbrica dell’infelicità : new economy e movimento del cognitariato. Rome: DeriveApprodi.

Bey, H. (2009). T.A.Z.: The Temporary Autonomous Zone, Ontological Anarchy, Poetic Terrorism. Brooklyn: Autonomedia.

Bobbio, N. (1987). The future of democracy : a defence of the rules of the game. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Boltanski, L., Chiapello, È., & Elliott, G. (2018). The new spirit of capitalism. London-New York: Verso Books.

Camus, A. (1961). Rebel : an essay on man in revolt. New York: Knopf.

Chicchi, F. (2012). Soggettività smarrita : sulle retoriche del capitalismo contemporaneo. London: Mondadori.

Christiano, T. (2004). The authority of democracy. Journal of Political Philosophy, 12(3), 266–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00200.x

Comitè Invisible. (2007). The coming insurrection. Retrieved on May 11, 2009 from tarnac9.wordpress.com

Comitè Invisible, & Hurley, R. (2015). To our friends. South Pasadena: Semiotext(e).

Comitè Invisible, & Hurley, R. (2017). Now. South Pasadena: Semiotext(e).

Debord, G. (2014). The society of the spectacle. Berkeley: Bureau of Public Secrets.

Floridi, L. (2015). The onlife manifesto. Being human in a hyperconnected era. Cham: Springer Open.

Foucault, M. (2020). Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. London: Penguin Books.

Habermas, J., Cronin, C., & De Greiff, P. (2005). The inclusion of the other : studies in political theory. Oxford: Polity.

Han, B.-C. (2017). Psychopolitics. London-New York: Verso Books.

Han, B.-C. (2020). La emergencia viral y el mundo de manana. Byung-Chul Han, el filosofo surcoreano que piensa desde Berlin. Retrieved from El Pais website: https://elpais.com/ideas/2020-03-21/la-emergencia-viral-y-el-mundo-de-manana-byung-chul-han-el-filosofo-surcoreano-que-piensa-desde-berlin.html

Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2016). Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Ippolita. (2017). Tecnologie del dominio : lessico minimo di autodifesa digitale. Sesto San Giovanni: Meltemi.

Lippmann, W. (1997). Public opinion. New York: Free Press Paperbacks.

Lyon, D. (2005). 9/11, synopticon, and scopophilia: watching and being watched. In The New Politics of Surveillance and Visibility (pp. 35–54). University of Toronto Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442681880-002

Marder, B., Joinson, A., Shankar, A., & Houghton, D. (2016). The extended “chilling” effect of Facebook: The cold reality of ubiquitous social networking. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 582–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.097

McLuhan, M., & Powers, B. R. (1989). The global village : transformations in world life and media in the 21st century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mezza, M., Amen, R., & Satta, T. (1997). 1977: l’anno che non finì. Italy: RaiDue.

Nozick, R. (2015). Anarchy, state and Utopia. New York: Wiley.

Orwell, G. (2001). The road to Wigan pier. London: Penguin Books in association with Martin Secker & Warburg.

Skinner, B. F. (1972). Beyond freedom and dignity. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Ventura, R. A. (2019). La guerra di tutti : populismo, terrore e crisi della società liberale. Rome: Minimum fax.

Viénet, R. (1973). La dialectique peut-elle casser des briques? France.

Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. Journal of Information Technology, 30(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.5

Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism : the fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. New York: PublicAffairs.

Published
2020-10-09