Divari digitali e disuguaglianze in Italia prima e durante il Covid-19
Digital Divides and Inequalities in Italy Before and During the Covid-19
The digital divides refer to access to infrastructure and technological devices, to skills required to take advantage of such access, and the structural dynamics of social inequalities, in the framework of the platform society. The Covid-19 emergency has certainly enhanced some lines of fracture between who is included and who is excluded from the network society. At the same time, the emergency has contributed to stress the need to acknowledge which are the implications of digital divides for inclusion and the full exercise of democratic citizenship. This article relies on the analysis of public policies and of the mediatized debate, taking the Covid-19 crisis as a temporal juncture. Through a review of the main measures adopted during the emergency in Italy and the comparison between lexical occurrences in media articles before and during the Covid-19, the study describes the process of politicization of the digital divides. The crisis has contributed to shift the focus from an economic and neoliberal frame, that has dominated the narrative on digital democracy so far, towards a frame of social inclusion that bring back into the agenda the rights of children, of elders, of women and of residents in rural areas.
Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (Eds.). (1980). The civic culture revisited. New York: Little & Brown.
Baiocchi, G., & Ganuza, E. (2014). Participatory Budgeting as if Emancipation Mattered. Politics & Society, 42(1), 29–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329213512978
Banaji, S., & Buckingham, D. (2013). The civic web: Young people, the Internet and civic participation. Boston, MS: The MIT Press.
Beck, U. (1987). The Anthropological Shock: Chernobyl And The Contours Of The Risk Society. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 32, 153–165.
Beck, U. (2000). La società del rischio. Roma: Carocci.
Commissione Europea (2019). Digital Economy and Society Index. Country Profile Italy. Bruxelles: Commissione Europea. Disponibile al link: https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=59994.
Commissione Europea (2020). Digital Economy and Society Index. Country Profile Italy. Bruxelles: Commissione Europea. Disponibile al link: https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=66946.
Dahlgren, P. (2009). Media and political engagement: Citizens, communication, and de-mocracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
De Blasio, E. (2018). Il governo online: Nuove frontiere della politica. Roma: Carocci.
De Blasio, E. (2019). e-Democracy. Teorie e problemi. Milano: Mondadori.
De Blasio, E., & Sorice, M. (2016). Innovazione democratica: Un’introduzione. Roma: Luiss University Press.
De Blasio, E., & Sorice, M. (2018). Populism between direct democracy and the technolo-gical myth. Palgrave Communications, 4(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0067-y
della Porta, D. (2020). How social movements can save democracy: Democratic innova-tions from below. Cambridge: Polity.
Di Mascio, F., & Natalini, A. (2018). Oltre il new public management. Roma: Carocci.
Dryzek, J. S. (1990). Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy, and Political Science. Cam-bridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fawcett, P., Flinders, M., Hay, C., & Wood, M. (Eds.). (2017). Anti-politics, depoliticiza-tion, and governance. Oxford. Oxford University Press.
Fuchs, C. (2017). Social media: A critical introduction. London: SAGE.
Geissel, B., & Joas, M. (Eds.). (2013). Participatory democratic innovations in Europe: Improving the quality of democracy? Berlin: Barbara Budrich.
Giannone, D., & Santaniello, M. (2019). Governance by indicators: The case of the Digital Agenda for Europe. Information, Communication & Society, 22(13), 1889–1902. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1469655
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Habermas, J. (2001). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Boston, MS: The MIT Press.
Hargittai, E. (2002). The second-level digital divide: Differences in people’s online skills. First Monday, 7(4). http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_4/hargittai/index.html
Hay, C. (2008). Constructivist Institutionalism. In S. Binder, R. A. W. Rhodes & B. Rock-man (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548460.003.0004
Helsper, E. J., & Reisdorf, B. C. (2017). The emergence of a “digital underclass” in Great Britain and Sweden: Changing reasons for digital exclusion. New Media & Society, 19(8), 1253–1270. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816634676
ILO. (2020). COVID-19 Cruelly Highlights Inequalities and Threatens to Deepen Them. Disponibile al link: https://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/newsroom/news/WCMS_740101/lang--en/index.htm, ultimo accesso 28/5/2020.
ISTAT. (2019). Cittadini e ICT - Anno 2019. Disponibile al link: https://www.istat.it/it/files//2019/12/Cittadini-e-ICT-2019.pdf, ultimo accesso 28/5/2020.
Jessop, B. (2016). The state: Past, present, future. Cambridge: Polity.
Livingstone, S. (2004). What is Media Literacy? Intermedia, 32(3), 18–20.
Mayne, Q., & Geissel, B. (2016). Putting the demos back into the concept of democratic quality. International Political Science Review, 37(5), 634–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512115616269
Mihailidis, P., & Thevenin, B. (2013). Media Literacy as a Core Competency for Engaged Citizenship in Participatory Democracy. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(11), 1611–1622. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213489015
Morlino, L. (2012). Changes for democracy: Actors, structures, processes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Moro, G. (2013). Cittadinanza attiva e qualità della democrazia. Roma: Carocci.
Napoli, P. M., & Obar, J. A. (2014). The Emerging Mobile Internet Underclass: A Critique of Mobile Internet Access. The Information Society, 30(5), 323–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2014.944726
Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Park, S. (2017). Digital capital. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Parkinson, J., & Mansbridge, J. J. (2013). Deliberative systems: Deliberative democracy at the large scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ragnedda, M. (2018). The third digital divide: A weberian approach to digital inequalities. New York: Routledge.
Ragnedda, M., & Ruiu, M. (2017). Social capital and the three levels of digital divide. In M. Ragnedda & G. Muschert (Eds.), Theorizing Digital Divides (pp. 21–34). New York: Routledge.
Saccà, F. (2016). Culture politiche, informazione e partecipazione nell’arena politica 2.0. Sociologia, 3. https://doi.org/10.36165/2425
Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 303–326. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342
Silverstone, R. (1994). Television and everyday life. New York: Routledge.
Sorice, M. (2014). I media e la democrazia. Roma: Carocci.
Sorice, M. (2019). Partecipazione democratica: Teorie e problemi. Milano: Mondadori.
Sorice, M. (2020a). Conflitto e partecipazione. In E. Mangone, F. Ieracitano, & G. Russo, Processi culturali e mutamento sociale (pp. 253–268). Roma: Carocci.
Sorice, M. (2020b). Sociologia dei media: Un’introduzione critica. Roma: Carocci.
Swyngedouw, E. (2009). Civil Society, Governmentality, and the Contradictions of Gover-nance-beyond-the-State: The Janus-Face of Social Innovation. In D. MacCallum, F. Moulaert, J. Hillier, & S. Vicari Haddock (Eds.), Social Innovation and Territorial De-velopment (pp. 63–78). Farnham: Ashgate.
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2014). Nudge: La spinta gentile. Milano: Feltrinelli.
van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018). The platform society. Oxford: Oxford Uni-versity Press.
van Dijk, J. (2020). The digital divide. Cambridge: Polity.
Van Lancker, W., & Parolin, Z. (2020). COVID-19, school closures, and child poverty: A social crisis in the making. The Lancet Public Health, 5(5), e243–e244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30084-0
van Zoonen, L. (2005). Entertaining the citizen: When politics and popular culture con-verge. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.